Part II
by
Eric Julien
21 April 2006
from SaveLivesInMay Website
Basically, Eric’s research on nuclear
weapons disrupting the space time continuum is very important to
acknowledge, and I believe he was correct to connect this to the US
plans for a preemptive nuclear war in Iran. His argument that
ETs fragmented the comet back in 1995 is something that got my
attention due to the underlying logic that any political scientist
would recognize - realpolitik at a galactic level. So the
possibility of a comet fragment being aimed at Earth eleven years
ago to teach the US a lesson before it could launch a preemptive
nuclear war at this time is plausible from the perspective of
galactic realpolitik involving ETs with the ability to
manipulate Space Time. That was one of the reasons why I
initially supported Eric’s research.
Now Eric has gone out on a limb and
said that there will be a comet strike on May 25 and specified it
hitting in the Atlantic Ocean between the Tropic of Cancer and the
Equator, generating 200 meter tidal waves, etc. That’s not something
I support. I basically think he has overreached himself in terms of
correctly reading all his data and has excluded other possibilities
of how ETs might respond. If the US does go ahead with a
preemptive nuclear strike against Iran, I would certainly argue that
there is very likely to be repercussions that involve one or more ET
groups. The ET response however may happen in many ways and
not necessarily a comet strike.
So in conclusion while I don’t support
Eric’s prediction of a May 25 Comet impact, I do understand that
his support for this has reached a world wide audience and that is
waking many people up to how ETs might respond to an aggressive US
nuclear policy. That greater global awareness may in the end put off
indefinitely or stop such plans for a preemptive nuclear strike
which would be good for all of us. I notice for example that a group
of distinguished physicists have released a petition demanding the
Bush stop plans for a preemptive nuclear war: http://jurist.law.pitt.edu/paperchase/2006/04/us-physicists-urge-bush-to-respect.php
The nuclear ET connection is still
the most important part of Eric’s research in my view, and I
hope that it gets more attention than his comet prediction which
does unnecessarily alarm people in my view.
Michael
Salla
from PrepareForContactYahooGroup
Website |
This article
follows upon the article entitled "MAY 25, 2006 - the Day of
Destiny". It brings new elements of confirmation of the
imminent cometary danger which threatens humanity and describes the
conditions of its advent around MAY 25, 2006.
The fear of
ridicule is infinitely greater than fear of the death of others. As much,
I believed that my first article was going to cause panic. It was even
reproached to me. Not at all! Many are very afraid, indeed, but only to
pass for insane. I thus decided to insist on points of detail to convince,
to open the spirits with this great probability of collision in order to
save lives while it is time!
The reception of the news was
"massive" but dispersed in a broad spectrum of opinions, energy of the
aggressive and irrational rejection to the most apathetic fate. But,
throwing me in a great state of sadness, I sometimes noted a total
disinterest for the human life, that which each one can still save by
taking suitable academies measurements. Was the tsunami from December 2004
in Sumatra - hardly more than one year ago - forgotten? A small reminder
in images.
Will we await this kind of scene to act and alert the population of
the imminence of a possible catastrophe?
It is necessary for us to keep firmly our feet on the
Ground to prepare us with the test. It is not a question of the end of the
world but of a decisive stage in our awakening with solidarity, and why
not with fraternity. The goal of my step being the safeguarding of the
life in a spirit of mutual aid, I come to share my information and
reflections, as any citizen of the world would do it, free and
responsible.
Beyond these
personal considerations, let us observe the facts attentively. Here first
of all is what the event will resemble about which we speak
here.
Perhaps you
think that your government will take the necessary measures to evacuate
the areas at the risks? There exists very few countries having dared to
evacuate a city or a whole area, even after the warning of famous
scientists. China, for example, carried out an evacuation of
100,000 people in several weeks because of a proven forecast of seismic
events. It would take several months to quietly organize the
displacement of several million people. We have only a few days, soon a
few hours. No government will never announce in advance the width of a
catastrophe if it is not able to face it. NONE!
Look at what
occurred with the Hurricane Katrina and Louisiana...
The
only realistic way to face a catastrophe of this magnitude - two hundred
meter high waves - is solidarity between the human beings by spreading the
information from one to the other, by giving simple instructions like
going up the highest possible elevation, leaving further from the
coasts... without forgetting familiar close relations, his/her friends,
neighbors and animals.
Harbingers will warn you imminent
danger: animals fleeing, deafening noises, abnormal winds, abnormally low
tide and even certainly the appearance of UFOs! But do not wait the
last moment, you would risk the mortal trap of the congestion. Benefit
from a long weekend far from the beach. By chance, MAY 25,
2006, is... Ascension Day!
A comet of influence
All started from a night contact during which I had an
answer: MAY 25, 2006! I do not have the space here to develop the
arguments which are in favor of the existence of other realities of the
universe which man can reach, nor to convince each one that certain
psychic faculties are accessible with all with the proviso of preparing
themselves.
That would
require to approach epistemological and perceptive considerations in
advanced physics, in particular at the place of the theories of
relativity of Einstein and quantum physics, that very little
understand in-depth.
Here a simple
explanatory diagram, by reducing, of the very new theory of
Absolute Relativity on which I worked, helped of my
extratemporal friends. The recognition of my work by physicists and
mathematicians authorizes this height of sight.
A
bibliographical review of the proven cases of extrasensory perceptions
would resemble a long litany. Remember, the police force, in some of its
investigations, is not encumbered scorn or wrongful intellectual
frilosity when it calls upon faculties of psychics to solve cases that
seem to have no solution. These men of law and order, which maintain this
strange partnership are interested only in the results, not to the
specious debates.
If the police force thus solves criminal
enterprises at the point to prevent other crimes, the proper authorities
could as much anticipate an announced global drama. It is what I request
from the decision makers interested in public safety and natural disasters
in their country. It is imperative to evacuate the populations concerned
sufficiently early, or at least to prepare them from a logistic point of
view.
I had predicted for example, in September 2003, the terrible
earthquake of 26 December 2003 that led to more than 40,000 deaths in
Bam... in Iran. I had indicated that a major catastrophe was
going to occur at the end of December 2003, at the beginning of January
2004. The counterparts lasted three weeks! Another earthquake took place
later after a few days in Morocco. I had evoked, in the same
prediction, a connection with the Mediterranean.
This night
meditation of April 7, 2006 thus led me to receive on behalf of creatures
which I earlier describe as extratemporals a date - that of MAY
25, 2006 - dependent on an extremely lucid vision of giant catastrophe
of few three years earlier. I duly wrote about this vision, like others to
come, in a book published recently. Then, having spoken about this
communication in a French forum, I learned that a fragmented comet,
73P/Schwassmann-Wachmann
3 (SW-3), was to precisely pass very close to the Earth in
May 2006, and that 25 this month precisely corresponded to the crossing,
by the fragmented comet, of the ecliptic plane on which the Earth
revolves.
This surprising "coincidence", which the probability
borders on a chance on a few million to one, must be examined in detail.
Let us recall that the fragmentation of the SW-3 comet took place in 1995
under strange conditions and that only three fragments were first seen.
Since this date the comet has carried out two elliptic
revolutions around the sun. Here is a comment by Philippe Morel
of the French Astronomical Society:
"on June 6, 2006 it will enter again the very restricted circle
of the comets whose distance nearest to the Earth will be less than 15
million kilometers. Accustomed passages to more close to the Earth the
comet Schwassmann-Wachmann 3 (SW-3) had approached us with the
Astronomical distance of 0.0617 Unit (UA) in 1930. "
There are
175 comets referred at short period,[1] of which most famous is Halley’s
Comet. The above table shows the closest passages of SW-3. The
comet was discovered by Arnold Schwassmann and Arno Arthur
Wachmann in May 1930, one sees indeed that its nearest passage
was in 1930. But in May 2006, the passage is closer, for the fragment
S which will interest us, is estimated at 0.0487 UA (7.3 million
kilometers). It is true that the majority of the fragments should pass on
average to 0.065 UA, but it is enough for ONLY ONE FRAGMENT to start a
major event. What to say to a restricted circle of comets of less than 8
million kilometers?
Only two passages to 0.03 UA for Halley (837
after JC), and 0.04 UA for C/1132 T1 (1132) did better than the
fragment S of SW-3! But they were not fragmented, and thus not
likely to deviate, by gravitation, towards the Earth.
In May 2006,
SW-3 will be not only among the rare comets that closely approach the
Earth, but also among comets having known the greatest magnitude ever
reached. It is the first time that a fragmented comet crosses our path at
such a short distance. It is thus the first time in known history where
such an event will take place. The predictions of the astronomers are not
thus founded on any historical scientific precedent in the very precise
case which occupies us.
More and more, one evokes the probability
of a rain of meteorites at the end of May, at the beginning of June 2006.
Curious... In 1930, with the passage of SW-3, however much further than
next mid-May, and without the fragmentation which we know today, the Earth
had 70 fragments per hour. They were small enough to burn up in the upper
atmosphere.
There is a comet known to have fragmented and being
transformed into swarm of meteorites: 3d/Biela.[2] It was in 1852 that it was observed
for the last time. It separated in two visible fragments for three months
in 1846. The moment most favorable for its observation was the year 1865
at a distance from 0.481 UA is TEN TIMES FURTHER that the fragment
S from SW-3!
In connection with 3d/Biela, one knows today
that:
"in 1872,
year corresponding to a new return, a new swarm of meteorites,
Andomédides, made its appearance (3.000 meteorites per hour 27
November). Calculations showed its affiliation with the Biela
comet. The swarm appeared again in 1885 (15.000 meteors/hour), in 1892
(6.000 meteors/hour), then in 1899 (150 meteors/hour). [3]
"150, 3000, 6000 and even
15000 meteorites per hour! A starry sky in full day! What to say about
the meteors of SW-3 ten times closer? Let us indicate that this SW-3
comet, of the family of Jupiter comets, was the object of a
great interest to the international scientific community, in particular
in December 1994 since it was among the rare objectives of the
inspection program of the ESA probe of the Rosetta mission. A series of
monthly photographs were produced until June 1995.
It was
precisely on June 25 1995 that the crop circle called
"Missing Earth" appeared at Longwood Warren in the County of
Hampshire in England. This crop circle, a gigantic view of the interior
solar system, to the belt of asteroids, was designed without the Earth.
Let us note, for the skeptics, that amateur hoaxers had tried to
reproduce an identical crop circle without success.[4]
Knowing that
the planets, as well as comet on these drawings, turn in the reverse
direction to needles of a watch, this agroglyphe seems to refer to
the position of the solar system on MAY 14, 2006 at the time of the
closest passage of the SW-3 comet.
But what the
creators of this crop circle seem want to say is that this date precedes
in fact the actual date since Mars, whose orbit is the first
visited by the comet, is upstream of its position at the time of the
impact which the "Missing Earth” crop circle suggests.
After the appearance of the crop circle at the end of June 1995,
SW-3 was seen for the last time in its normal state by a Japanese amateur
astronomer on August 20, 1995. [5] It is at the beginning of September,
two months only after the appearance of the crop circle "Missing
Earth” that SW-3 has taken an abrupt and violent turn, [6], precisely at the time it passes the
ecliptic plane of the Earth. A press release of January 1996[7] announced that the observatory of
Paris Meudon, using the radio telescope of Nancay, made a series of
measurements on the emission by comet of molecules of hydroxyl from the 8
to September 12, 1995. The values were completely abnormal at the time
when SW-3 crossed our ecliptic plane.
In a round of almost 2.5
billion kilometers, it is in the vicinity of the terrestrial orbit - in an
interval representing less than 1% of its trajectory - that SW-3 was
broken, before illuminating the sky and pointing out themselves...
Chance? This luminous start will reach a magnitude thousand
times higher than the normal in October 1995, after having passed by its
perihelion and to have sailed in parallel during several million
kilometers to the terrestrial orbit. For a comet to break apart at the
time of its closest passage to the Earth an explicit symbol? Wouldn’t this
be an exopolitical message of a great clarity?
Curiously, an
Internet site tells us that,
"the comet
was one of the targets of the mission Contour (Comet Nucleus
Tour), scheduled for July 2002. The probe was to leave in the
direction of 3 comets (overflight of 2P/Encke in November 2003,
73P/Schwassmann-Wachmann 3 in June 2006, and of 6P/d’
Arrest in August 2008) to analyze them and compare them.
Unfortunately, a technical failure caused the destruction of the
probe a little after its take-off ".
A technical
failure?
Today nobody has a final explanation on this for why
the fragmentation of SW-3 occurred. The comet consists of ice, and the
sun vaporizes part of its surface at its approach at the perihelion -
nearest approach to the center of its revolution, i.e. sun - and equips it
with a tail with light. But for centuries SW-3 revolved around
the sun according to the same trajectory without disintegrating! The
heart of a comet remains basically rigid and extremely cold. The only
acceptable explanation, for the scientific community, is thus the
collision of SW-3 with a small asteroid. But this explanation poses many
problems. And it is an euphemism.
The mysterious comet is, at the
moment of its passage, hundreds of million kilometers from the belt of
asteroids. What are the chances of a collision between two small isolated
objects, in the interplanetary vacuum, without real any gravitational
influence? Almost zero! Imagine two billiard balls launched by
chance on a large table like the United States. They are more likely to
collide than SW-3 with an improbable vagrant. The idea will be posed that
there exists nearly 800 qualified objects of Potentially Hazardous
Asteroids. But the chances of such a collision in a given segment -
that which is shown in red in the diagram above - are very close to zero.
But let us suppose that such a collision took place by chance, how
to explain such a magnitude for so "a small" object? One needed a colossal
energy to deploy a value thousand times higher than the normal. Of course,
fragmentation, in itself is extremely rare, temporarily supported a
greater luminous magnitude with the approach of the sun, but certainly not
in the evoked values. The press release of the European Space Agency
[8] in January 1996 is
clear:
"Only some
rare comets made the experiment of an increase in so large and
unexpected luminosity. At the time of this event, SW-3 just came
to pass its perihelion after having crossed the terrestrial orbit in its
trajectory of distance. The distance separating it from the Earth was
close to 200 million kilometers ".
If this
fragmentation were only due to the sun we would have, among 175 existing
comets, a majority of them in a normal state of fragmentation. They would
thus not live centuries, and even millennia. However, fragmented comets
are very rare. The fragmentation of SW-3 "was thus
facilitated" in an artificial way, just like it was probably the case
of 3d/Biela having known exactly the same conditions of destruction
near the terrestrial orbit.
3d/Biela was probably
destroyed because it represented a danger in the future. It was
potentially to have its nearest passage in December 1905 (0.0616 UA). This
possible collision would have come much too early in our history, in
particular in the history of the atomic weapon, at the moment when
we had not made a decisive choice yet. It was probably about a work of
celestial cleaning made by our extraterrestrial "gardeners"
present, then, since glosses at our sides, contrary to extraterrestrials
of the new UFO era begun in 1945.
Was the activity of the sun
exceptional in the phase of the perihelion to produce or support this
bursting of SW-3? No, on the contrary! It was during the most
stable time and without major solar flare activity, at the end of the
eleven years cycle started in 1986 and finishing in 1996. It is in the
medium of the cycles that the solar flares are most intense, as shows it
below the graph in various wavelengths. Contrary to the generally accepted
ideas, the enigma is thus far from being commonplace. It is an
unquestionable mystery.
This
cometary fragment, for me and in accordance with my communications
with it, was caused by an advanced intelligence having a perfect
knowledge of the celestial mechanics and travel in time. This intelligence
literally fragmented the comet, by heating its heart artificially, and
after having been informed of a very probable future, namely the accession
with current political leaders, and advisers.
Extraterrestrials have the capacity to go and come in time
when they reach the temporal high densities. I explain the principle of
fractal time in my first book. This faculty is also shared by the
authentic psychics, like each one among us at the time of the premonitory
dreams. The current political leaders are preparing for a massive use of
nuclear weapons against which these intelligences are opposed for their
own safety reasons.
In the temporal high densities,
occupied by the extraterrestrial ones, atomic weapons produce
devastating effects up to hundreds of light-years. The energy which is
propagated in our material world, at the time of a thermonuclear
explosion, comes from a space time to which the macroscopic universe in
which we live does not have normally access.
And since we have
just spoken about the sun, we should know about an emerging scientific
battle that rages to determine the true nature of the solar activity which
one hitherto thought was thermonuclear.
For reasons that are
incomprehensible, the temperature of the solar corona is much higher - 2
million degrees - than the temperature of surface - 6000 Kelvin's degrees.
However, the theory should be that the heart of the star which is
extremely hot by gravitational compression, generating a nuclear fusion.
But we do not have any formal and direct proof of it. We have even strong
indices of the opposite. Why speak about the nature of the sun whereas we
are worried by a huge tsunami on Earth predicted to occur next May
25?
If there are no thermonuclear explosions in the sun then our
own atomic tests, spread out over fifty years, had and will have a
considerable incidence on the other space times of the universe, in other
realities of the worlds. Then imagine the systematic use of nuclear
weapons in the war that certain governments are now preparing.
The
extratemporals are our neighbors, not of space,
but of the space time. It is perhaps complex to understand but it
is a reality that the best physicists of this small and fragile blue
planet will not be so easily rejected. They know on the end of their
fingers the theoretical limits of the current scientific models. Now, we
are not any more in the theoretical world but in the real world.
It is absolutely no question here of cultural, nor of political
choice in favour. It is a question of a planetary civilization, ours, in
contradiction with the principles of non-interference with respect
to other worlds. It is not them which interfere while coming to see us,
but we who interfere by materializing them, by means of the nuclear
tests in particular, in our physical world!
I hear here and
there that the "Galactic
Confederation" would never authorize
an aggression of extraterrestrials against the Earth, nor... a
direct intervention of our extraterrestrial allies in the name of a
non-intervention engraved in the marble of the evolution. What a
anthropocentric vision! But is there not a major paradox? We are, I am
afraid, the invaders of advanced stellar civilizations, but also of
purely spiritual worlds. While exploding the atomic weapons, we
cause a temporal hurricane which the eye could swallow the world of the
souls. If we launch nuclear bombs, they will launch comets.
Indeed,
the Sky is inhabited infinitely more than the Earth. We will
understand it ourselves once we are there! Perhaps we would make the same
thing. It is not a war between extraterrestrials and human, but between
ExtraTemporels and Materialized Consciences, even
materialists. Perhaps our own beloved deceased are, where they are,
favorable to this brutal answer. 90% of the population of this planet
believe in the existence of a life after death. But even 1% do not know
what it resembles. I believe it useful that we engrave this in our
memory.
How will the fragmented comet SW-3 behave?
Here a table of figures which I carried out on the
basis of simulation of trajectories and positions accessible on Internet
site from Near Earth Objects Program. One finds there primarily
information of distances and dates. The lines in red indicate the four "groups" of fragments.
On the date of
May 14, 2006, we should see the configuration indicated below. The
figures which follow are a reconstitution which I realized by systematic
pointing to synthesize the relative positions of the fragments.
What do we see
which is remarkable? Three essential elements appear clearly for our
comprehension of the stake. What is initially striking is the existence of
three different cometary trajectories. Then, we see four "groups"
of objects: With, Y, B-X and S. At last, the distances between
"groups of fragments" are very long. For example, 25 million kilometers
separate fragment A from fragment S. It should be indicated that at
the date of April 18 a twenty-second fragment appeared, fragment Z. It is
not mentioned here but belongs to the group of B - X. In the same way, on
April 19, thirteen other fragments, noted AA to AM, made their appearance
while resulting from this same B-X group.
I call the fragments
A, Y and S "groups of fragments" for two reasons.
Initially because we are unaware of the existence of unobservable
fragments too small around these principal fragments. Then because while
approaching the Earth, these fragments A, Y and S doubtless will split
themselves up.
Indeed, the heat of the sun will act on the
comet as an ice floe which melts slowly in water glass. It will split up
early or late. Nevertheless, the year 2006 is one particularly calm period
for solar activity since we are in the medium of the eleven years cycle.
The strong solar flares will be non-existent. Vaporization will remain
relatively slow. On another side, smaller, unobservable fragments for the
moment, will also be able to last until the perihelion of comet being well
after the Earth. Except if, of course, one of them runs up against our
planet.
It is precisely the scenario of my vision. Donald
Yeomans, Head of Near Earth Objects Program with NASA,
affirmed in an interview March 24, 2006: [9]
“This is a
rare opportunity to watch a comet in its death throes—from very close
range. There’s no danger of a collision. Goodness, no. The closest
fragment will be about six million miles away--or twenty-five times
farther than the Moon."
However, at the
time even where this interview was given, the fragment S was
observed on March 24, 2006 with the Mount Lemmon Survey. It is estimated
to pass at 7.3 million kilometers as the table shows above, and not 10
million kilometers as announced everywhere. It is probable that at the
time of writing this article, other fragments are estimated at a weaker
distance still. If it is not already done, it will be soon the case.
The problem is that we discover the fragments of smaller size
only at the last minute under the terms of a principle easy to
understand. The luminous magnitude of an object increases as it approaches
us. Thus, the smallest objects, hitherto invisible, are observed only a
few days, even a few hours before they cross us our path. Often, moreover,
they enter our atmosphere. But they are too small and disintegrate in high
altitude. It is the principle that applies to meteor showers.
In
the case which interests us we deal with a comet. It is a fast object,
thus having a great energy. We see in the table of NASA below that
relative speeds of approach are about 15 kilometers a second for
SW-3 (73P/Schwassmann-Wachmann 3). If the fragment is
sufficiently large, its inertia will be large important and the
terrestrial attraction will have only one weak influence, in particular if
it is far as it is the case of the group B-X. On the other hand, if it is
rather small, Earth will attract it towards it.
It is the case of
the vision that I had. By observing the table of the closest objects
attentively - visible table on the site of NASA[10] - we see the already
last objects - in the first table the objects move away from us - and to
come - in the second table the objects approach us. The asteroids 2006 HG
and 2006 GB1 of the second table for example, of an approximate size of 50
meters, are announced only little time before crossing. The more one moves
further into the future (second table), the more the objects are large,
with some rare exceptions. But these two objects HG and GB1
have only one speed from approximately 5 km/s. No danger.
In the
same way, it is not astonishing to see in the recent past (first table)
much smaller objects (2006 GU2, EY, FH, GC). But that does not mean
however that we saw all the objects having crossed very close the Earth!
This is why the astronomers often announce dangerous crossings
afterwards!
The size of the
fragments of the 73P/SW-3 comet is not reported to us. But no
fragment of less than fifty meters will be seen before May 15, even on May
20.
-
What to say
of an object 20 meters in diameter, of a weight of 15 tons launched to
54,000 kilometers/hour (15 km/s)?
-
What to say
if this object is accelerated by terrestrial gravity under the terms of
an almost parallel trajectory of a million kilometers?
-
Could it
reach 40 km/s, as I indicated in my first article, and to have the power
of a few hundred of atomic bombs to shake the mid-Atlantic rift?
We immediately
see in the figure above that it is not at all about a "string of pearls"
as announced here and there. With the origin, in 1995, the astronomers saw
four fragments then three (A, B, C), the fourth having been vaporized
and/or made invisible by its size. Taking into account the distance
separating the groups between them we let us deduce an "abnormal" activity
from it. Indeed, the three fragments of origin (A, B, C) are in front of,
on the trajectory of fragment A.
Something
thus slowed down the fragment S, either in a small explosion
having moved away in opposite direction Y and S, or by a voluntary
braking. In both cases, there is no reason so that there are not other
fragments around, and especially behind S.
We see that the
fragment S is an extremely serious candidate for a collision with
the Earth. If it is not the fragment S, it can be a fragment, still
unobservable, being in the back of this one. Let us observe the alignment
of the "string of pearls". The plan of the ecliptic is represented below
by a straight line green.
In the two
following diagrams we visualize the trajectory that the fragment S,
or another resulting from S, can borrow. Seen from top (first appears
below) the trajectory of collision is registered perfectly between the
extremes.
In the same
way, taking into account the variations of distance in height in a sight
"of profile", it is not improbable that a fragment moves towards the Earth
on a trajectory "parallel" with the others (see below).
The angular
difference between the blue and orange slopes is only of 5°, identical to
the difference between the trajectories "known" after the ecliptic plane
(represented here by a green straight line).
In other words,
there is, there too, no heresy to consider the deviation of a fragment
towards the Earth, the more so as the solar wind, matter made up of
billions of particles, appreciably drives the smallest fragments
towards our planet, as a balloon in a morning breeze.
Can I point out
that I was unaware of the existence of the comet when I received the date
of MAY 25, 2006 for the realization of my vision of a catastrophe
in the Atlantic? It is important to take some precautions on the
assumption that some would affirm that it was obvious that such an event
was to occur. It is thanks to extraterrestrials that I learned much on the
man behaviors.
Actually, in spite of appearances, the OBJECTIVE
chances of a catastrophe are statistically very few. This is
why, when that arrives, the reasons of this one, the intervention of
extraterrestrial for reason of nuclear weapons, will remain
engraved in the memory of the people because such an intervention is
necessary!
To be complete on the question, we must present an
alternative to the scenario which I presented. You will find below the
relative trajectories (sight of top and profile) of three groups of
objects for the dates of 1st, 5, 15, and 25 MAY 2006. These
three groups are the group of the B-X fragments, S and the asteroid 2006
GY2 about which I spoke earlier. At the three dates indicated taken
independently, there is no risk, as indicated clearly in the figures.
On left the
sights of top are, on the right the sights of profile. The asteroid 2006
GY2 is itself a potential danger with its closest point to the Earth of
0.0171 UA (MAY 16, 2006), a diameter from 500 to 1000 meters and a
speed of relative approach compared to the Earth of 20 km/s.
But the true
danger is perhaps indirect. Indeed, this asteroid 2006 GY2
will pass in the middle of the group of SW-3B-X fragments which forms in
fact a swarm much larger than on the figures (see the figures of the
preceding pages).
This danger
comes at the same time from its convergent trajectory at the worst moment
(closest point of the asteroid), of its one kilometer broad size and its
relative speed of 5 km/s (20 km/s (asteroid) less 15 km/s (comet))
representing 18000 kilometers per hour, eighteen times the speed of sound.
This speed of
approach constitutes a very great danger to the Earth because the struck
fragments would be not only deviated towards the Earth, but, would have
moreover acquired an increased speed of collision, increasing terribly the
power of a striking object.
SW-3B
represents here a group of 40 fragments!
The proof by the crop circles
The majority of people take crop circles as weak
material proof. I will show why the crop circles presented are
decisive confirmations of the vision of catastrophe which I had for MAY
25, 2006. Once again, it is not at all about the end of the
world but of a major catastrophe!
First of all, I
suggest that those which doubt the importance of the crop circles read "the Science of
Extraterrestrials"[11] where their creation is explained
simply. The figures below gives the general principle of it by showing the
effect of the field of greater temporal density of a luminous vessel on
corn ears. Without entering here in detail, this field humidifies ears,
ionizes them, contracts them and attracts them in a powerful magnetic
field to make them fall on the ground and thus form figures in
cereals.
Do the
extraterrestrials really know the future? They are really the
creators of crop circles. An article written by Andy Thomas
describes the creation of a circle of culture in 1994 indicated by the
simple name "galaxy".[12]
A thorough
study of the galactic configuration of this crop circle by Jack
Sullivan, an amateur astronomer, gives without any possible doubt a
date in the future: April 6/7, 2000!
What did it occur
in the night from the 6 to April 7, 2000? One of the biggest solar
flares of the century, threatening satellite communications, says Andy
Thomas.[13] How a crop circle
can predict with such a precision a celestial event of this nature if it
is not by obtaining this information from the future?
Absolute
Relativity makes it possible to consider this exploit without
difficulty by redefining the time nature and the reigns of the evolution.
Does this crop
circle "galaxy" point out the sun activity? Andy Thomas evokes the
work of Maurice Cotterell establishing the bond between the
emergence and the fall of civilizations, solar radiations and the cycles
of the sun. But he is not the only one.
Jean-Pierre
Garnier Malet,[14] doctor
in physics, also showed the relevance of this bond, in particular for
2012,
by making profitable the message crop circle below. It drew some
the revolutionary conclusions for science, in perfect adequacy with the
fruit of my scientific papers according to my communications with the
extraterrestrials.
On the basis of the crop circle
below...
It deduced the
doubling theory inducing the existence of an accelerated time...
It thus comes
to give a considerable weight to the idea of fractal time at the base even
of the technology of extraterrestrial as I presented it in “The Science of
Extraterrestrials”.
It gives key
elements to understand how extraterrestrials exceed easily the
speed of the light. The diagram below shows the overlapping temporal
bubbles like Russian dolls around a vessel, showing us his absolutely
incredible behavior and yet of a logical simplicity.
We see that the
interpretation of the crop circles is an exercise for the expert.
There are other examples where individuals, at the centre even of the
scientific community, made profitable the messages of crop circles to lead
to incredible conceptual innovations. I do not have the place for a
treatise on the authentic circles of culture (of extraterrestrial origin)
and their direct and major contribution to science.
Both crop
circles related to MAY 25, 2006 lead me to briefly present the
theory of the anomaly. This theory is that which governs the effective
mode of communication of extraterrestrials in the corn fields. It calls
upon our higher degree of intelligence through a language of symbolism and
coded meaning.
This is why the crop circles are not
translatable by everyone but by intellectually advanced human beings
in the qualitative sense. There is only one group of individuals on Earth
able to interpret the crop circles correctly. One could even say that for
each message exists only one receiver whose field of research
corresponds precisely to the message. Thus, not only are true crop circles
are distinguished from the hoaxes by their many and abnormal physical
characteristics, but also because of their rigorously directed
significance.
There are
three levels of evolution for intelligence.
-
The causal
intelligence is that of the average person who establishes relations
of cause for purpose between the phenomena. It is the role of current
science through, in particular, the equations.
-
The
intelligence of the meaning is that of the intuition where
bonds of significance are established between situations and clues
apparently without relation. The evolved intelligence, that of
extraterrestrial, is symbolic and subtle because it speaks by
images and association of ideas.
-
The
creative intelligence is the highest stage. It supplants any
causal relation, subtle or not, by psychically creating any situation.
It is the divine level of perfect visualization, that of the pure
art.
The
communication of extraterrestrials with the men through crop
circles implies an objective and a particular language from them. The
extraterrestrials are advanced intelligences expressing themselves in an
elaborate language. They know our technical and scientific level. They
thus do not find it beneficial to simply show us what we can check for
ourselves, as the exact date of any planetary configuration. It is not a
question of monkeys awaiting a reward after having carried out an
imitation of our knowledge. That does not literally make any sense. They
do not need to show the superiority of their intelligence. Their
technology is, in this respect, a sufficiently invidious message for the
man.
On the other hand, they may find it beneficial to voluntarily
add a “mistake” so that we can ask the right questions. It is even the
principle of the relevant communication: to draw the attention, and to
transmit a message of reflection. Like known as Small Prince of
Saint-Exupéry, "the rose has importance only when we look after
it".
In the case of the "Missing Earth", not only is the
Earth missing but it is for a precise reason. Not because it would
be in several different places according to the years having identical
configurations - everyone knows that the interior planets are fast and
often find similar positions - but because we are supposed to ask: "where
did the Earth pass? ". And overall: "why did it disappear?
"
Thus, the date
of May 14, 2006 is perfect because, in the image of the Earth which
meets comet for the configuration suggested, the "mistake" of the
position of Mars suggests that the event the extraterrestrials want
to tell us is AFTER MAY 14, 2006. For this reason Mars, in this crop
circle, is slightly beyond the real position of MAY 14, 2006 (NASA
simulation), date of the comet approach at the closest point from
Earth, of which each one could think that it is favorable with a
collision.
Why choose Mars rather than another planet?
Because it is Mars which SW-3 initially "will see". Mars
thus indicates from where the danger will come corresponding to the
"Missing Earth".
In the same way, the crop circle of 1995
pointing to September 6, 2003 shows an "anomaly": the intruder
close to Venus. The question that the allied extraterrestrials ask
us is:
"you
recognized September 6, 2003 (observe what will occur on this date), but
did you understand the reason of this particular point on the trajectory
of the Earth in connection with September 6, 2006?”
The answer is
that the question of the World Referendum, that I received on
September 6, 2003, is related to the collision of comet. It tries to
prevent it. It is thus necessary to read again the message of benevolent
extraterrestrials, "Do you Wish Us to Show
Up?" [15]
Here are some
extracts:
Peace and
reunification of your peoples would be a first step toward the harmony
with civilizations other than yours….
This message would be of no
interest if these manipulators’ tutorate did not reach its peak and if
their misleading and murderous plans did not materialize in a few years
from now. Their deadlines are close and mankind will undergo
unprecedented torments for the next ten cycles. ...
We can offer
you a more holistic vision of the universe and of life, constructive
interactions, the experience of fair and fraternal relationships,
liberating technical knowledge, eradication of suffering, controlled
exercise of individual powers, the access to new forms of energy and,
finally, a better comprehension of consciousness. ...
The danger
would move away from your residences because you would indirectly force
the undesirable ones, those which we call the third part, to show
themselves and disappear. You would bear the same name and would have
the same roots: Humanity! ...
Translate and spread this message
widely. This action will affect your future in an irreversible
and historical way at the scale of milleniums, otherwise, it will
postpone a new opportunity to choose to several years later, at least
one generation, if it can survive. ...
Not choosing,
stands for undergoing other people’s choice. Not informing others stands
for running the risk of obtaining a result that is contrary to one’s
expectations. Remaining indifferent means giving up one’s free will.
The crop circle of September 6, 2003, called
"Asteroid ", thus has an intruder in the representation of the
interior solar system.
One can easily
imagine that it is about a potentially dangerous object, in fact
SW-3, since it is on the trajectory of the Earth.
We can notice
that the intruder leads us to another anomaly in this crop
circle, that of the asteroid belt on the orbit of Mars whereas
it is actually well beyond. It should not be there! The asteroids
are numerous and represent a danger of collision for planets, just like
the intruder in the near future. Moreover, the asteroids are laid
out in a rather anarchical way in the drawing ("asteroid"), contrary to a
rigorously circular alignment in the first circle of culture ("missing
Earth"). This message of “Asteroid” could even describe the
multiplicity of the object located on the trajectory of the Earth, i.e.
its fragmentation!
Just let us note that the
intruder is slightly inside the terrestrial orbit, like SW-3 at
the time to cross the ecliptic plane. Why would this be this comet rather
than another object?
For the simple reason that this crop circle
indicates a date, September 6, 2003, date of reception of an
EXTRATERRESTRIAL MESSAGE OF PEACE: "Do you Wish Us to Show Up?" It
is about a world referendum diffused primarily on Internet in more than
one hundred countries, historically the most known in the world. The
relation between this message and the intruder is not in any
doubt today. The individual that received the message is also that which
accepted the date of collision of comet - in PERFECT ALIGNMENT with
scientific data - on May 25, 2006!
Why is the object beside
Venus rather than on its elliptic trajectory around the sun?
On September 6, SW-3 was still very far from the interior
solar system. What is remarkable, on the other hand, is to note that the
intruder is contrary to the terrestrial orbital position. The message of
peace corresponding to this crop circle seems to differ from a message of
war and destruction, like announcing the danger of a confrontation coming
from extraterrestrials, different from the creators of this crop circle.
The danger is indeed extraterrestrial since it is out of our
planet, hence its representation in an astronomical
form.
Venus, symbol of the love in our subconscious,
is perhaps not foreign with the fraternal solutions suggested by the world
referendum to solve the threat of war. This is why, through the world
message, Venus protects us from the influence of the intruder. This
last is strongly related to Mars, subconscious symbol of force, war
and destruction. An alternative is thus proposed to humanity.
Mars is actually represented five times in this crop circle
of "the asteroid", focusing our attention, by an incredible mathematical
precision cleverly proved by Jack Sullivan [16], over the year that this message
indicates: 2003. Mars occupies in this figure exactly the positions
of a eight years cycle on its own orbit, But, eight years, it is also the
number of years separating the year of the crop circle creation (1995)
from the year indicated in this one (2003)!
The remarkable aspect
of the symbol of Mars, threatening the Earth of a rain of
objects (SW-3 fragmented), is that, remember, this planet was, and
this for centuries in astronomy, at the closest point from Earth only a
few days BEFORE September 6, 2003, like the intruder will be
announced at the closest point from Earth BEFORE May 25, 2006, as
the crop circle "Earth missing" indicates it. Most incredible is that the
five positions of Mars also correspond to the lower Venus
conjunctions (closest point from Earth), symbolizing the specific
influence of the love in the conscience of the men by a message of peace
("do you wish us to show up?”).
But what did the men do with this
message translated in more than fifteen languages these three last years?
Many were mobilized.
This is why in several places of the world,
AFTER the diffusion of this message "Do You Wish us to Show Up?",
for the first time in UFOlogy history, tens, even hundreds of lights were
seen in the skies, as the photographs show below, without natural or
technical explanation coming to contradict this demonstration of goodwill
of benevolent extraterrestrials.
But this
mobilization is for the moment unfortunately too weak to reach the
critical point necessary for a massive appearance of material
vessels as proposed by these extraterrestrial allies.
Both crop
circles of 1995, "Missing Earth" and "Asteroid", are closely
dependent. The chronological order of appearance of these crop circles is
exactly that of the dates symbolized in those: June 20 for the “Asteroid",
June 25 for the "Missing Earth". Initially a message of peace from our
allies, then a message of war from our adversaries. When one
compares the layout of both crop circles, one sees a clear
stylistic difference, suggesting authors of different faction. The loop is
complete.
"Missing
Earth"
"Asteroid"
These two crop
circles were made the same year, in 1995, just after launching in 1994 of
the Star Wars program by the Clinton administration in its
reduced version. But the Bush administration made its spearhead of
it since he has held the top position of power This is why the danger of
collision exists right now, at the moment when we are on the verge of
engaging in a nuclear conflict!
We do not have now much any more
of time to change the course of the history. You should know that I do not
gain anything by warning you of this danger. It is even precisely the
opposite. But failing to show you what I saw, and the suffering that I
felt, I tried to present as many determining and verifiable elements to
you as possible.
Why not, as of today, take precautions and alert
all those which you can? Those which, as brilliant as they are, say to you
that nothing will occur on MAY 25, 2006 will not be there to hold
your hand at the proper time to save you. They will say just: "My God!
What a horror!"
But you will not be able to say anything.... except
if you think by yourselves right now.
References
[1] http://perso.wanadoo.fr/pgj/periode-f.htm
[2] http://neo.jpl.nasa.gov/cgi-bin/db_shm?sstr=biela&group=com&search=Search
[3] http://perso.wanadoo.fr/pgj/periode-f.htm
[4] Here is an extract of a private letter speaking about this
hoax:
”that
beautiful and charismatic that the geometrical design was used in 2001
to create a man-made (hoaxed) replica of it in the East Field near
Alton Barnes in Wiltshire, England. This copy was made for a
movie-project but was planed to be conducted like a real hoax... under
"real" circumstances (even if the farmer was paid) but the hoax went
wrong and the hoaxers were caught in the act already soon after
midnight by several researchers... also the hoaxing took them until
the early morning into the sunlight and I guess it was something like
8:00 or 9:00 in the morning when they finished. The ground floor
looked in some places very rough but also not too bad... but it was
a very obvious hoax.”
[5] Extract
of the press release from ESA:
“On August
20, it was observed by a Japanese amateur astronomer at magnitude 13,
quite normal for this comet at the given heliocentric distance. This
corresponds to about 700 times fainter than what can be seen with the
unaided eye”.
[6] http://www.eso.org/outreach/press-rel/pr-1996/pr-01-96.html
[7] http://www.eso.org/outreach/press-rel/pr-1996/pr-01-96.html
[8] http://www.eso.org/outreach/press-rel/pr-1996/pr-01-96.html
[9] http://science.nasa.gov/headlines/y2006/24mar_73p.htm
[10] http://neo.jpl.nasa.gov/ca/
[11] La
Science des Extraterrestres, Eric Julien, JMG Editions, Juillet 2005.
[12] http://www.swirlednews.com/article.asp?artID=659
[13] “On the night of 6/7th April 2000, one of the
largest solar storms of the century erupted on the Sun, flooding the
Earth’s ionosphere with particles and creating the widest sighting of
the aurora borealis across the UK and other parts of Europe for many
years, usually being restricted to more northern regions (…) The solar
storm, caused by an enormous flare thrown out by the Sun as it
approached its eleven-year peak of sunspot activity, had been measured
by some observatories as a G4 event on a scale of 1 to 5 – very big,
threatening satellite communications and other electronic
systems”.
[14] http://www.garnier-malet.com/resume_theorie.htm
[15] http://www.geocities.com/changetheworld_now/french.htm
[16] http://www.swirlednews.com/article.asp?artID=659
|